Skip to content

Conversation

@jkeenan
Copy link
Contributor

@jkeenan jkeenan commented Nov 26, 2025

Addresses #23964.


  • This set of changes does not require a perldelta entry.

@jkeenan jkeenan requested review from iabyn, leonerd and tonycoz November 26, 2025 23:31
Copy link
Contributor

@iabyn iabyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that its not slowing anything down by being there, I would be tempted to keep in case of any hypothetical XS-constructed optrees which bypass the compile-time check.

Test suite does not reach this code block, but Dave M recommends
retaining it in case of (hypothetical) XS-constructed optrees
which bypass compile-time check.

For: GH Perl#23964 (issue); GH Perl#23965 (p.r.)
@jkeenan
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkeenan commented Nov 27, 2025

Given that its not slowing anything down by being there, I would be tempted to keep in case of any hypothetical XS-constructed optrees which bypass the compile-time check.

Okay, since I'm mainly concerned with clearing away the underbrush for #23618, I'll revert the code and include an inline comment.

@jkeenan jkeenan force-pushed the pp_ctl-c-remove-unreachable-code-20251126 branch from 8f53576 to 6f60178 Compare November 27, 2025 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants